- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-757/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 July 2023 — Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (Appeal — Authentication of a judgment by the General Court — Article 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Copy of the judgment to be served — Signature of the judges — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101 TFEU — Market for tantalum and aluminium electrolytic capacitors — Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of pricing — Concept of infringement ‘by object’ — European Commission’s burden of proof — Statements of undertakings — Reliability — Geographic scope of anticompetitive conduct — Single and continuous infringement — Fine — Calculation of the basic amount — Sales to be taken into account — Mitigating circumstances — Unlimited jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0757
62021CA0757
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 321/6
(Case C-757/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Authentication of a judgment by the General Court - Article 118 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Copy of the judgment to be served - Signature of the judges - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101 TFEU - Market for tantalum and aluminium electrolytic capacitors - Agreements and concerted practices in respect of several elements of pricing - Concept of infringement ‘by object’ - European Commission’s burden of proof - Statements of undertakings - Reliability - Geographic scope of anticompetitive conduct - Single and continuous infringement - Fine - Calculation of the basic amount - Sales to be taken into account - Mitigating circumstances - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(2023/C 321/06)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Nichicon Corporation (represented by: A. Ablasser-Neuhuber, G. Fussenegger, H. Kühnert and F. Neumayr, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party: European Commission (represented by: B. Ernst, T. Franchoo, C. Sjödin and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Nichicon Corporation to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140