- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-390/14: Action brought on 3 June 2014 — Établissement Amra/OHIM (KJ KANGOO JUMPS XR)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0390
62014TN0390
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.9.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 315/64
(Case T-390/14)
2014/C 315/108
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Établissement Amra (Vaduz, Liechtenstein) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 March 2014 in Case R 1511/2013-2 in its entirety;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The position mark, consisting of the lower spring portion of a sporting and exercising device and containing the word elements ‘KJ KANGOO JUMPS XR’ for goods in Class 28 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 7 26 494
Decision of the Examiner: The application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.