EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-379/17: Action brought on 20 June 2017 — Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft v EUIPO — C & C IP (T)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0379

62017TN0379

June 20, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/39

(Case T-379/17)

(2017/C 256/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft KG (Mülheim an den Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: H. Prange and S. Köber lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: C & C IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘T’ — Application for registration No 011 623 097

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2017 in Case R 415/2015-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

set aside the Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (Trade Marks and designs) (‘EUIPO’) of 23 March 2017 in the appeal No R 415/2015-5 concerning the opposition proceedings No B 002 256 702 regarding European Union Trade Mark Application No 011 623 097, which was received by the applicant on 12 April 2017, and to amend it to the effect that the opposition is rejected in its entirety;

order the defendant and, as the case may be, the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia