I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Word mark HAIRTRANSFER - Refusal of registration - Lack of distinctive character)
Language of the case: German
Appellant: Indorata-Serviços e Gestão, Lda (represented by: T. Wallentin, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Weberndörfer, acting as Agent)
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 15 February 2007 in Case T-204/04 Indorata-Serviços e Gestão, Lda v OHIM, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of the decision refusing registration of the word mark HAIRTRANSFER for goods and services in Classes 8, 22, 41 and 44 — Distinctiveness of the mark
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Indorata-Serviços e Gestão, Lda is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.