EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-163/23: Judgment of the General Court of 9 July 2025 – Fritz Egger and Others v ECHA (Melamine) (REACH – Substances of very high concern – Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Ultra vires – Proportionality)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0163

62023TA0163

July 9, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4591

(Case T-163/23)

(REACH - Substances of very high concern - Establishment of a candidate list for eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Decision identifying melamine as a substance meeting the criteria laid down for inclusion in the list - Right to be heard - Principle of good administration - Article 57 of Regulation No 1907/2006 - Manifest error of assessment - Ultra vires - Proportionality)

(C/2025/4591)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Fritz Egger GmbH & Co. OG (St. Johann in Tirol, Austria) and the seven other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the judgment (represented by: M. Ahlhaus, lawyer)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä, N. Herbatschek and A. Hautamäki, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicants: LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz GmbH, formerly Borealis Agrolinz Melamine Deutschland GmbH (Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany), Grupa Azoty Zakłady Azotowe Puławy S.A. (Puławy, Poland), OCI Nitrogen BV (Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands), Cornerstone Chemical Co. (Metairie, Louisiana, United States) (represented by: R. Cana, E. Mullier and Z. Romata, lawyers), Sonae Arauco, SA (Madrid, Spain) and the seven other interveners whose names are set out in the annex to the judgment (represented by: F. Niermeier and M. Ahlhaus, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and N. Scheffel, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek the annulment of Decision D(2022)9120-DC of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of 16 December 2022, in so far as that decision identifies melamine as a substance of very high concern for the purposes of Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Fritz Egger GmbH & Co. OG and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA);

3.Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the European Commission to bear their own costs;

4.Orders LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz GmbH, formerly Borealis Agrolinz Melamine Deutschland GmbH, Grupa Azoty Zakłady Azotowe Puławy S.A., OCI Nitrogen BV and Cornerstone Chemical Co. to bear their own costs;

5.Orders Sonae Arauco, SA and the other interveners whose names are set out in the annex to bear their own costs.

(1)

OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4591/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia