- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-174/23, Twenty First Capital: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation – France) – HJ, IK, LM v Twenty First Capital SAS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 2011/61/EU – Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) – Operating conditions – Article 13 – AIFM remuneration policies and practices – Scope ratione temporis – Article 61 – Transitional provisions)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0174
62023CA0174
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5775
(Case C-174/23, Twenty First Capital)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 2011/61/EU - Alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) - Operating conditions - Article 13 - AIFM remuneration policies and practices - Scope ratione temporis - Article 61 - Transitional provisions)
(C/2024/5775)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: HJ, IK, LM
Defendant: Twenty First Capital SAS
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 61(1) of Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010 must be interpreted as meaning that:
the Member States were under an obligation to require alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) performing activities under that directive before 22 July 2013 to comply fully with the obligations relating to remuneration policies and practices stemming from Article 13(1) of that directive from the date on which their authorisation was obtained, provided that they had submitted an application for authorisation within one year from 22 July 2013.
2.Article 61(1) of Directive 2011/61 must be interpreted as meaning that:
the phrase ‘shall take all necessary measures to comply with national law stemming from this Directive’ requires that AIFMs performing activities before 22 July 2013 refrain from taking measures which are liable seriously to compromise the achievement of the objective of Directive 2011/61.
—
(1) OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5775/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—