- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-73/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 18 November 2015 — FH v European Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Application for payment of the daily subsistence allowance — Implied rejection followed by an express rejection — No complaint against the implied rejection — Express rejection confirmatory in nature — Complaint time-barred — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FB0073
62015FB0073
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.1.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 7/36
(Case F-73/15)( (<span class="super">1</span>))
((Civil service - Officials - Application for payment of the daily subsistence allowance - Implied rejection followed by an express rejection - No complaint against the implied rejection - Express rejection confirmatory in nature - Complaint time-barred - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2016/C 007/48)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: FH (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and N. Chemaï, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the daily subsistence allowance to the applicant following his transfer from the Commission, where he was employed in the EU Delegation to Yemen, to the European Parliament, in Brussels.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.The European Parliament is to bear its own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by FH.
Language of the case: French.
(1) OJ C 245, 27/7/2015, p. 50.