I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2013/C 252/51
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Kenzo Tsujimoto (Osaka, Japon) (represented by: A. Wenninger-Lenz, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kenzo (Paris, France)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trademarks and Designs) of 25 March 2013 (Case R 1364/2012-2);
—Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘KENZO’, for services in classes 35, 41 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 8 701 286
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark of the word mark ‘KENZO’, for goods in classes 3, 18 and 25
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the CTM application in its entirety
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 76(2) and 8(5) of CTMR.