- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-692/18: Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Montanari v EEAS (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Ad hoc inspection report — Refusal of access — Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 — Article 8(b) of Regulation No 45/2001 — Transfer of personal data — Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of investigations — Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0692
62018TA0692
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 36/29
(Case T-692/18) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Ad hoc inspection report - Refusal of access - Article 4(1)(b) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the privacy and integrity of the individual - Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 - Article 8(b) of Regulation No 45/2001 - Transfer of personal data - Article 4(2), third indent, of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of investigations - Article 4(3) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Obligation to state reasons)
(2020/C 36/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Marco Montanari (Reggio Emilia, Italy) (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, R. Spac and E. Orgován, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of EEAS of 24 October 2018 by which EEAS refused to grant the applicant access to the report of 29 July 2017 drawn up by A.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of 24 October 2018 by which the European External Action Service (EEAS) rejected the confirmatory application for access to documents made by Mr Marco Montanari on 13 September 2018;
2.Orders EEAS to pay the costs.
Language of the case: French
* * *
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2020036EN.01002901-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2020036EN.01002901-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 35, 28.1.2019.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140