EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-502/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 October 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — State Secretary van Justitie v Mangat Singh (Directive 2003/109/EC — Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents — Scope — Article 3(2)(e) — Residence based on a formally limited permit)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CA0502

62010CA0502

October 18, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/4

(Case C-502/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Directive 2003/109/EC - Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents - Scope - Article 3(2)(e) - Residence based on a formally limited permit)

2012/C 379/06

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie

Defendant: Mangat Singh

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Raad van State — Interpretation of Article 3(2)(e) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44) — Concept of a ‘formally limited residence permit’ — Residence permit not offering any prospect of a residence permit of indefinite duration, but which can be extended indefinitely

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(2)(e) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘residence permit [which] has been formally limited’ does not include a fixed-period residence permit, granted to a specific group of persons, the validity of which may be extended indefinitely without however offering any prospect of a residence permit of indefinite duration where such a formal limitation does not prevent the long-term residence of the third country national in the Member State concerned, that being a matter for the referring court to ascertain.

*

Language of the case: Dutch.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia