EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-574/11: Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Unipol Banca v OHIM — Union Investment Privatfonds (unicard)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0574

62011TN0574

October 31, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/23

(Case T-574/11)

2012/C 6/42

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Unipol Banca SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by: P. Costa and P. Creta, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH (Frankfut am Main, Germany)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of 13 July 2011 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 0597/2010-2 brought on 14 April 2010 by Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH and, accordingly

Grant Community trade mark application No 005240080 filed on 18 July 2006 concerning the sign unicard also in respect of the services referred to in Class 36 of the Nice Agreement.

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Unipol Banca SpA

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘unicard’ (application for registration No 5.240.080) for services in Class 36

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Union Investment Privatfonds GmbH

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word marks ‘UNIFONDS’ (No 991.995), ‘UNIGLOBAL’ (No 991.996) and ‘UniGarant’ (No 30 138 306,5) for services in Class 36

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the decision of the Opposition Division and rejected the application for registration of the mark in question

Pleas in law: Misapplication and misinterpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia