- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-51/25, Betaal Garant Nederland: Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 28 January 2025 – Betaal Garant Nederland CV v De Nederlandsche Bank NV; other party: Vereniging Eigen Huis
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0051
62025CN0051
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2181
22.4.2025
(Case C-51/25, Betaal Garant Nederland)
(C/2025/2181)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Betaal Garant Nederland CV
Defendant: De Nederlandsche Bank NV
Question referred
Must Article 4(3) of Directive 2015/2366 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC, read in conjunction with point 3(c) of Annex I of that directive, be interpreted as meaning that a service entailing the receipt and forwarding of funds provided by an entity as an intermediary, constitutes a payment service – and, more specifically, the execution of transfers within the meaning of that Directive – if, in the context of a contract with a client and a contractor, that entity receives the client’s funds on its payment account and, after the client has given its consent, transfers those funds from that payment account to the contractor?
—
(1) OJ 2015 L 337, p. 35.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2181/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—