EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-497/22: Action brought on 12 August 2022 — Mordashova v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0497

62022TN0497

August 12, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.9.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 368/31

(Case T-497/22)

(2022/C 368/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Marina Alexandrova Mordashova (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: T. Bontinck, D. Bogaert, A. Guillerme and L. Burguin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 in so far as it includes the applicant at No 1156 in the annex to that decision;

annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 in so far as it includes the applicant at No 1156 in Annex I to that regulation;

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her action against Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878, in so far as they concern her, the applicant relies on four pleas in law:

1.The first plea in law alleges a breach of the right to effective judicial protection and the administration’s obligation to state reasons.

2.The second plea in law alleges a manifest error of assessment in relation to the Council’s reasons.

3.The third plea in law alleges a breach of the principle of proportionality and of fundamental rights as regards the adoption of restrictive measures against the applicant and unjustified interference with the applicant’s fundamental rights guaranteed under the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

4.The fourth plea in law alleges a breach of the principle of equal treatment and the principle of legal certainty.

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/883 of 3 June 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 92).

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/878 of 3 June 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (OJ 2022 L 153, p. 15).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia