I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Community trade mark - International registration - Request for territorial extension of protection - Word mark TAME IT - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2009/C 256/46
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Wella AG (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: B. Klingberg and K. Sandberg, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 October 2007 (Case R 713/2007-2), relating to a territorial extension, to the European Community, of the protection in respect of the international registration of the word mark TAME IT
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Wella AG to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.