I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 344/105
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: G-Star Raw CV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: J. van Manen, M. van de Braak and L. Fresco, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: PepsiCo, Inc. (New York, United States)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 June 2013 given in Case R 1586/2012-2;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings;
—Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the present proceedings, should it intervene, as well as those incurred in the proceedings before the OHIM.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘PEPSI RAW’ for goods in class 32 — Community trade mark application No 6 788 004
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Verbal mark ‘RAW’ for goods in Class 25 — Community trade mark No 4 743 225
Decision of the Opposition Division: Allowed the opposition and rejected the CTM application in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.