I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
16.10.2023
(Case T-67/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative mark XTRADE - Relative ground for invalidity - Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) and Article 60(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2023/133)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Guma Holdings Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus) (represented by: M. Oleksyn and M. Stępkowski, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: XTB S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by P. Maślak-Stępnikowska, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2021 (Case R 981/2020-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Guma Holdings Ltd to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/133/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
(C/2023/133)