- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-646/19: Action brought on 26 September 2019 – eSky Group IP v EUIPO – Gröpel (e)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0646
62019TN0646
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.11.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 383/78
—
(Case T-646/19)
(2019/C 383/86)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: eSky Group IP sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: P. Kurcman, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gerhard Gröpel (Straubing, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark e in colours turquoise, white, dark blue, blue and light pink – Application for registration No 16 731 333
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 July 2019 in Case R 223/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—annul the decision of Opposition Division of 29 November 2018 adopted in opposition proceedings No B 2 957 168;
—refer the case back to EUIPO;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Opposition Division, Board of Appeal and General Court.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—