EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-164/23, VOLÁNBUSZ: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 September 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szegedi Törvényszék – Hungary) – VOLÁNBUSZ Zrt. v Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kormányhivatal (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Road transport – Harmonisation of certain provisions of social legislation – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 9(3) – Concept of employer’s operational centre where the driver is normally based – Place where a driver takes charge of a vehicle falling within the scope of that regulation – Concept of other work – Time spent by that driver driving a vehicle falling outside the scope of that regulation to travel to or from that operational centre)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0164

62023CA0164

September 26, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/6619

11.11.2024

(Case C-164/23,

VOLÁNBUSZ)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Road transport - Harmonisation of certain provisions of social legislation - Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 - Article 9(3) - Concept of ‘employer’s operational centre where the driver is normally based’ - Place where a driver takes charge of a vehicle falling within the scope of that regulation - Concept of ‘other work’ - Time spent by that driver driving a vehicle falling outside the scope of that regulation to travel to or from that operational centre)

(C/2024/6619)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VOLÁNBUSZ Zrt.

Defendant: Bács-Kiskun Vármegyei Kormányhivatal

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(3) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85

must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘employer’s operational centre where the driver is normally based’ set out in that provision designates a place, such as an external depot for vehicles falling within the scope of that regulation, from which the driver concerned usually carries out his or her shift and to which he or she returns at the end of that shift, in the normal exercise of his or her functions and without complying with specific instructions from his or her employer in that regard. Whether sanitary facilities or social or rest areas are present at such a place is irrelevant in that regard. However, the geographical proximity of the place of residence of that driver may be taken into account, without being decisive in itself.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6619/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

*

Language of the case: Hungarian.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia