EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-646/22: Action brought on 14 October 2022 — Piaggio & C. v EUIPO — e-bility (Scooter)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0646

62022TN0646

October 14, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.12.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 463/58

(Case T-646/22)

(2022/C 463/86)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Piaggio & C. (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci and B. La Tella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: e-bility GmbH (Remagen, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design (Scooter) — Community design No 4363588-0001

Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2022 in Case R 1663/2020-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

declare the proprietor’s Community design registered under No 4363588-0001 invalid;

order the defendant and the proprietor to pay the procedural costs relating to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

order EUIPO and the potential other party to the present proceedings to pay all of the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

Incorrect assessment and unfounded exclusion of decisive evidence provided by the applicant;

Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;

Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia