I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2022/C 463/86)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Piaggio & C. (Pontedera, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci and B. La Tella, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: e-bility GmbH (Remagen, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design (Scooter) — Community design No 4363588-0001
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2022 in Case R 1663/2020-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare the proprietor’s Community design registered under No 4363588-0001 invalid;
—order the defendant and the proprietor to pay the procedural costs relating to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
—order EUIPO and the potential other party to the present proceedings to pay all of the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Incorrect assessment and unfounded exclusion of decisive evidence provided by the applicant;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.