I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-34/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(EAGF - Expenditure excluded from financing - Specific support for the bovine and ovine meat sectors - On-site inspections - Physical verification of the animals - Quality of the inspections - Inspection report - Flat-rate correction - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - One-off correction)
(2019/C 4/29)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: initially, D. Kriaučiūnas, T. Orlickas and R. Krasuckaitė, and subsequently T. Orlickas and R. Krasuckaitė, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sauka and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2098 of 13 November 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015 L 303, p. 35).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Republic of Lithuania to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2019004EN.01002101-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2019004EN.01002101-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.