I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
(Case T-439/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark RADA PERFUMES - Earlier EU figurative marks PRADA - Earlier EU figurative mark PRADA MILANO DAL 1913 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2023/215)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Rada Perfumery SRL (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) (represented by: E.-M. Dicu, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Prada SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by G. Casucci, lawyer)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 April 2022 (Case R 1610/2021-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Rada Perfumery SRL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Prada SA;
3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/215/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *