- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-180/23: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Samar’t Pharma (BI blue pigment) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark BI blue pigment — Earlier EU figurative mark Bi.cell — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0180
62023TA0180
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
C/2024/2437
(Case T-180/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark BI blue pigment - Earlier EU figurative mark Bi.cell - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/2437)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and S. Vandezande, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Samar’t Pharma, SL (Vilamalla, Spain)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 17 January 2023 (Case R 1102/2022-4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders L’Oréal and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own costs.
(1) OJ C 179, 22.5.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2437/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *