- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-148/23: Action brought on 18 March 2023 — VK v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0148
62023TN0148
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 179/62
(Case T-148/23)
(2023/C 179/87)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: VK (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the following decisions:
—decision of 12 May 2022 rejecting the request to transfer contributions under Article 11(2) and (3) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union, issued by the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements PMO/2 Pensions (Ref: PMO 2, TFT IN, 3426594500), and
—decision of the appointing authority of 9 December 2022 rejecting the complaint (No. R/373/22) lodged under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union against the decision of 12 May 2022.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea, alleging infringement of the law, in so far as the general implementing provisions of the first paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations do not comply with the limits established in that article. The applicant raises a plea of illegality under Article 277 TFEU of those implementing provisions as contrary to superior legislation.
2.Second plea, alleging error of law in the interpretation of the concept of force majeure and of financial rules, in so far as the concept of force majeure is not a legal maxim, but rather an external factor precluding application of specific rules relating to whether a right is time-barred.