- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-776/16: Action brought on 4 November 2016 — Isocell v EUIPO — iCell (iCell.)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0776
62016TN0776
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 14/45
(Case T-776/16)
(2017/C 014/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Isocell GmbH (Neumarkt am Wallersee, Germany) (represented by: C. Thiele, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: iCell AB (Älvdalen, Sweden)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘iCell.’ — Application No 12 877 676
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 September 2016 in Case R 2496/2015-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—amend the contested decision by declaring that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and that EU trade mark application No 12877676 is refused;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.