- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-606/23, Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp and KIA Auto: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa (Latvia) lodged on 4 October 2023 — AS ‘Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp’, AS ‘KIA Auto’ v Konkurences padome
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0606
62023CN0606
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
Series C
C/2023/1437
18.12.2023
(Case C-606/23, Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp and KIA Auto)
(C/2023/1437)
Language of the case: Latvian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: AS ‘Tallinna Kaubamaja Grupp’, AS ‘KIA Auto’
Defendant: Konkurences padome
Questions referred
1.In accordance with Article 101(1) TFEU, for the purposes of determining the existence of a prohibited agreement establishing restrictions in respect of car warranties which, in order for the car’s warranty to remain valid, oblige or induce car owners to carry out the repair and maintenance of that car solely at authorised representatives of the car’s manufacturer and to use the original spare parts of that manufacturer in its servicing, must the competition authority demonstrate the existence of actual and real restrictive effects on competition?
2.In accordance with Article 101(1) TFEU, for the purposes of determining the existence of the agreement mentioned in the first question referred, is it sufficient for the competition authority to demonstrate solely the existence of potential restrictive effects on competition?
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1437/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *