I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-516/15) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark Limbic® Types - Lack of distinctive character - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
(2017/C 104/65)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze and G. Würtenberger, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2015 (Case R 1974/2014-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Limbic® Types as an EU trade mark.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 June 2015 (Case R 1974/2014-1);
2.Orders that EUIPO shall bear its own costs as well as those incurred by Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2017104EN.01004602-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017104EN.01004602-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.