EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-308/24: Action brought on 18 June 2024 – Engie E.S. v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0308

62024TN0308

June 18, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/4972

19.8.2024

(Case T-308/24)

(C/2024/4972)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Engie Energie Services (Paris, France) (represented by: N. Nahmias, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

annul the decision of 19 April 2024 by which the European Parliament rejected the tender submitted by the applicant in the consultation procedure for the award of the contract entitled ‘Operation and maintenance of technical installations in the buildings of the European Parliament in Strasbourg’, reference No 06A80/2023/M052, which it awarded to the company Dalkia SA;

annul the decision of 14 May 2024 by which the European Parliament refused the applicant’s request for review of the decision awarding the contract entitled ‘Operation and maintenance of technical installations in the buildings of the European Parliament in Strasbourg’, reference No 06A80/2023/M052, to Dalkia SA;

annul the decision by which the European Parliament awarded the contract entitled ‘Operation and maintenance of technical installations in the buildings of the European Parliament in Strasbourg’, reference No 06A80/2023/M052, to Dalkia SA, according to the award notice of 11 June 2024;

order the European Parliament to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 167(1) and Article 168(6) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and of the tender specifications in so far as the successful tender does not meet all the minimum requirements set out in the procurement documents.

2.Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment in the analysis of the conformity of the successful tender.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia