I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2012/C 194/37
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Applicant: Free (Paris, France) (represented by: Y. Coursin, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Conradi + Kaiser GmbH (Kleinmaischeid, Germany)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul in part the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 25 January 2012 in Case R 437/2011-2;
—rule that the application for registration of the disputed mark should be rejected in its entirety on the basis of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; and
—order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, both before the Court and before OHIM.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘FreeLounge’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 35 and 41 — application for registration No 8442832
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the French figurative mark No 99785839 ‘free LA LIBERTÉ N’A PAS DE PRIX’ for goods and services in Classes 9 and 38; the French word mark No 1734391 ‘FREE’ for services in Class 38; the company name ‘FREE’ used in the course of trade in France; the domain name ‘FREE.FR’ used in the course of trade
Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the application for the Community trade mark
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the contested decision
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009