I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-70/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS - Earlier EU figurative mark MUSEUM OF ILLUSIONS - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2021/C 252/28)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Metamorfoza d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia) (represented by: A. Bijelić, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Tiesios kreivės (Vilnius, Lithuania)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2019 (Case R 663/2019-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Tiesios kreivės and Metamorfoza.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2019 (Case R 663/2019-2);
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 103, 30.3.2020.