- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-788/21, Global Gravity: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Retten i Esbjerg — Denmark) — Skatteministeriet Departementet v Global Gravity ApS (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Classification of goods — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 7616 99 90 and 8609 00 90 — Tubular Transport Running System (TubeLock) — Meaning of ‘container’)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0788
62021CA0788
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.3.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 112/10
(Case C-788/21, (1) Global Gravity)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Classification of goods - Combined Nomenclature - Subheadings 7616 99 90 and 8609 00 90 - Tubular Transport Running System (TubeLock) - Meaning of ‘container’)
(2023/C 112/13)
Language of the case: Danish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Skatteministeriet Departementet
Defendant: Global Gravity ApS
Operative part of the judgment
Subheading 8609 00 90 of the Combined Nomenclature, set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013,
must be interpreted as not covering a device for transporting pipes that consists of a number of aluminium lifting profiles between two of which the pipes to be transported are placed perpendicularly, those two lifting profiles being linked together by two steel lifting poles that are equipped with eyelets, and on top of which additional pipes may then be placed in the same way until the load comprises the number of pipes to be transported, the load then being completed by the attachment of steel slings to the lifting poles at the four corners of the load (by passing them through the said eyelets) in order to facilitate handling of the load, which is a matter for the referring court to verify.
(1) OJ C 109, 7.3.2022.
Language of the case: Danish