- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-390/23, Rzecznik Finansowy: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 27 June 2023 — Rzecznik Finansowy
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0390
62023CN0390
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.9.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 338/10
(Case C-390/23, Rzecznik Finansowy)
(2023/C 338/14)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Rzecznik Finansowy
Other parties to the proceedings: Bank AG S.A., M.S., A.K.
Question referred
Does the second [subparagraph] of Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, in conjunction with the second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude national legislation which provides that a court of last instance (the Sąd Najwyższy) hearing an extraordinary appeal (extraordinary action) against a final judgment of an ordinary court is to sit in a panel which includes a person (a lay judge of the Sąd Najwyższy) who:
is not a judge of the Sąd Najwyższy;
has been appointed to perform his or her function:
directly by the legislature — by a simple majority,
on the basis of general and unverifiable selection criteria,
in a procedure which does not allow judicial review of the appointment,
for a term of four years;
and may be dismissed by the legislature, which is also not subject to judicial review?