- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-206/16: Action brought on 2 May 2016 — Bodegas Verdúguez v EUIPO (TRES TOROS 3)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0206
62016TN0206
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.7.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 251/35
(Case T-206/16)
(2016/C 251/41)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Bodegas Verdúguez, SL (Villanueva de Alcardete, Spain) (represented by: J. García Domínguez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TRES TOROS 3’ — Application for registration No 12 796 926
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2016 in Case R 407/2015-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—admit its action against the contested decision, annul that decision and hold that:
1)the prohibition in Article 7(1)(j) does not apply to the EU trade mark applied for;
2)in the alternative, and solely if the Court should consider that the prohibition in Article 7(1)(j) is applicable to the mark applied for, hold that that prohibition applies only with respect to ‘wine’ goods, thus maintaining the rejection solely in that regard and restoring the validity of the mark for the remainder of the goods claimed in Class 33.
—order EUIPO to pay the costs and to reimburse the appeal fees paid by the applicant to EUIPO, as the case may be.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article (7)(1)(j) of Regulation No 207/2009.