- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-592/20: Action brought on 28 September 2020 — Univers Agro v EUIPO — Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic (AGATE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0592
62020TN0592
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 390/41
(Case T-592/20)
(2020/C 390/59)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Univers Agro EOOD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Hernández-Martí Pérez, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shandong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic Co. Ltd (Dongying, China)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark AGATE — European Union trade mark No 16 440 596
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 July 2020 in Case R 725/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declares the EUTM No 16 440 596 as a valid trade mark;
—order EUIPO, and if applicable, the intervener, to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by considering the EUTM proprietor acted in bad faith when the application for the mark was filed;
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.