- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-504/11: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2013 — Hartmann v OHIM — Protecsom (DIGNITUDE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DIGNITUDE — Earlier national and Community word marks Dignity — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0504
62011TA0504
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 79/17
(Case T-504/11)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark DIGNITUDE - Earlier national and Community word marks Dignity - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 79/31
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany) (represented by: N. Aicher, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Protecsom SAS (Valognes, France)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Chamber of Appeal of OHIM of 28 July 2011 (Case R 1197/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Paul Hartmann AG and Protecsom SAS.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Paul Hartmann AG to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.