- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-277/07: Order of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Secure Computing v OHIM — Investrónica (SECUREOS) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TB0277
62007TB0277
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 347/31
(Case T-277/07) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 347/50
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Secure Computing Corp. (Roseville, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Investrónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: initially E. López Leiva, subsequently J.L. Zurdo Rivas, subsequently J.L. Zurdo Rivas and E. López Camba, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 April 2007 (Case R 1063/2006-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Investrónica, SA and Secure Computing Corp.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and the intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the defendant.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 235, 6.10.2007.