I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-82/23)
(2023/C 121/21)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Nextrend GmbH (Flörsheim am Main, Germany) (represented by: T. Weiland and C. Corbet, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Xiamen Axent Corporation Ltd (Haicang, China), Axent Switzerland AG (Rapperswil-Jona, Switzerland)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design No 2 769 299-0001
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 December 2022 in Case R 1604/2021-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare the design at issue invalid;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 63(2) in conjunction with Article 53(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.