I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Directive 96/67/EC - Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports - Article 1 - Scope - Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements - Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport - Article 6 - Groundhandling for third parties - Applicability of the competition rules - Article 102 TFEU)
(C/2025/2173)
Language of the case: Romanian
Appellant: Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional ‘Avram Iancu’ Cluj
Respondent: Consiliul Concurenţei
interested parties: Romanian Airport Services SA, Sindicatul Independent al Aeroportului Cluj
Articles 1 and 6 of Council Directive 96/67/EC of 15 October 1996 on access to the groundhandling market at Community airports
must be interpreted as not precluding the application of Article 102 TFEU in circumstances where a supplier of groundhandling services has been refused access to the airport infrastructure, which is necessary for the provision of such services, of an EU airport whose annual traffic, on the date of that refusal, was less than two million passenger movements.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/4075.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2173/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—