- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-2/15: Action brought on 2 January 2015 — Ipatau v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0002
62015TN0002
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.2.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 65/52
(Case T-2/15)
(2015/C 065/71)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Vadzim Ipatau (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul Council Decision 2014/750/CFSP of 30 October 2014 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus, in so far as it concerns the applicant;
—annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1159/2014 of 30 October 2014 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus, in so far as it concerns the applicant;
—order the Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-693/13 Mikhalchanka v Council (1).
(1) OJ 2014 C 93, p. 25.