EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-174/21: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 March 2023 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgaria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2008/50/EC — Ambient air quality — Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations — Article 260(2) TFEU — Obligation to take the necessary measures to comply with such a judgment — Failure to fulfil that obligation alleged by the European Commission — Lack of clarity of the letter of formal notice as to whether the judgment still had to be complied with on the reference date — Principle of legal certainty — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0174

62021CA0174

March 16, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/5

(Case C-174/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2008/50/EC - Ambient air quality - Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations - Article 260(2) TFEU - Obligation to take the necessary measures to comply with such a judgment - Failure to fulfil that obligation alleged by the European Commission - Lack of clarity of the letter of formal notice as to whether the judgment still had to be complied with on the reference date - Principle of legal certainty - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 164/06)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Noll-Ehlers and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria (represented initially by L. Zaharieva, T. Mitova and M. Georgieva, and finally by L. Zaharieva and T. Mitova, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

2.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Bulgaria;

3.Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.

Language of the case: Bulgarian

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia