- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-585/17: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 November 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — Proceedings brought by the Finanzamt Linz, Finanzamt Kirchdorf Perg Steyr (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Alteration of an authorised aid scheme — Article 108(3) TFEU — Notification requirement — Standstill obligation subject to approval from the European Commission — Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 — Exemption — Article 58(1) — Temporal scope of the regulation — Article 44(3) — Scope — National legislation laying down a formula for calculating a partial rebate of energy taxes)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CA0585
62017CA0585
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.1.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 10/2
(Case C-585/17) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Alteration of an authorised aid scheme - Article 108(3) TFEU - Notification requirement - Standstill obligation subject to approval from the European Commission - Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 - Exemption - Article 58(1) - Temporal scope of the regulation - Article 44(3) - Scope - National legislation laying down a formula for calculating a partial rebate of energy taxes)
(2020/C 10/02)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Finanzamt Linz, Finanzamt Kirchdorf Perg Steyr
Intervener: Dilly’s Wellnesshotel GmbH
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 108(3) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that national legislation which alters an aid scheme by restricting those eligible for such aid is, in principle, subject to the notification requirement laid down in that article.
2.Article 58(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 [TFEU] must be interpreted as meaning that aid granted before the entry into force of that regulation, on the basis of an aid scheme such as the one at issue in the disputes in the main proceedings, may be exempted, under that regulation, from the notification requirement laid down in Article 108(3) TFEU.
3.Article 44(3) of Regulation No 651/2014 must be interpreted as meaning that an aid scheme, such as the one at issue in the disputes in the main proceedings, in which the amount of an energy tax rebate is specifically fixed in a calculation formula provided for by the national legislation establishing that scheme, complies with that provision.
Language of the case: German.
* * *
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.