I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2019/C 112/58)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: DK Company A/S (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: S. Hansen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hunter Boot Limited (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark DENIM HUNTER — Application for registration No 14 649 891
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 in Case R 849/2018-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—reverse the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs including cost incurred by the applicant.
The Board of Appeal has erred in finding that a risk of confusion exists between the marks.