- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-451/14: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Fujikura v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Single and continuous infringement — Proof of the infringement — Duration of participation — Calculation of the fine — Gravity of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TA0451
62014TA0451
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.9.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 328/39
(Case T-451/14) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Single and continuous infringement - Proof of the infringement - Duration of participation - Calculation of the fine - Gravity of the infringement - Unlimited jurisdiction))
(2018/C 328/53)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fujikura Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by L. Gyselen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by A. Biolan, C. Giolito and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents, and by M. Johansson, lawyer)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Viscas Corp. (Tokyo) (represented by J.-F. Bellis, lawyer)
Re:
Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39610 — Power cables) in so far as it concerns the applicant and, in the alternative, an application for a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant in that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Fujikura Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission;
3.Orders Viscas Corp. to bear its own costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.