I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2016/C 111/49)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Munich, SL (Capellades, Spain)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a cross on the side of a sports shoe — EU trade mark No 2 923 852
Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2015 in Case R 2345/2014-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO to bear the costs.
—Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.