- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-236/17: Action brought on 17 April 2017 — Balti Gaas v Commission and INEA
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0236
62017TN0236
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.7.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 221/30
(Case T-236/17)
(2017/C 221/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Balti Gaas OÜ (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: E. Tamm and L. Naaber-Kivisoo, lawyers)
Defendants: European Commission and Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the defendants decision of 17 February 2017 Ref Ares(2017)890302 (1);
—order the defendants to bear their costs and pay those incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant submits that the defendants have not ensured that the procedures followed in awarding grants would have complied with the principles of legality, transparency and sound administration and relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging lack of competence.
2.Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of an essential procedural requirement on the ground of failure to give a statement of reasons.
3.Third plea in law, alleging a lack of statement of reasons.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging lack of material accuracy of the statement of reasons.
(1) Decision taken in relation to Commission’s Implementing Decision C(2016)1587 final of 17/03/2016 on amending Commission Implementing Decision C(2014)2080 establishing the multiannual work programme for granting financial aid in the field of trans-European energy infrastructure under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020