EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-581/22 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2024 – thyssenkrupp AG v European Commission (Appeal – Competition – Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 – Concentration between undertakings – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement – Determination of the relevant markets – Significant impediment to effective competition – Creation or strengthening of a dominant position – Non-coordinated effects – Standard of proof – Concepts of important competitive force and close competitors – Closeness of competition between the merging parties – Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index – Requests for information – Distortion)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0581

62022CA0581

October 4, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/1200

(Case C-581/22 P)

(Appeal - Competition - Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Concentration between undertakings - Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement - Determination of the relevant markets - Significant impediment to effective competition - Creation or strengthening of a dominant position - Non-coordinated effects - Standard of proof - Concepts of ‘important competitive force’ and ‘close competitors’ - Closeness of competition between the merging parties - Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index - Requests for information - Distortion)

(C/2025/1200)

Language of the case: English

Appellant: thyssenkrupp AG (represented by: M. Klusmann, O. Schley and J. Ziebarth, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by G. Conte, T. Franchoo, C. Sjödin and I. Zaloguin, and subsequently by G. Conte, T. Franchoo and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders thyssenkrupp AG to pay the costs.

Language of the case: English.

ECLI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1200/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1200/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia