- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-120/17: Action brought on 20 February 2017 — M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon v. EUIPO (fluo.)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0120
62017TN0120
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.4.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 121/46
(Case T-120/17)
(2017/C 121/66)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: M&T Emporia Ilektrikon-Ilektronikon Eidon AE (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: A. Spyridonos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘fluo’ — Application for registration No 14 664 486
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2016 in Case R 863/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in the part that it has rejected the trade mark in question and allow the trade mark to be registered for all the goods of class 9 of the Nice classification applied for;
—order EUIPO to pay the overall costs of the proceedings of all instances.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.