EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-43/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — van Heuckelom v European Police Office (Europol) (Civil Service — Staff Regulations of Europol — Article 29 — Advancement in step granted on the basis of staff reports — Plea of illegality of the decision establishing the policy for determining grades and steps — Respective powers of Europol’s Director and Management Board — Europol’s Director’s discretion — Limits)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009FA0043

62009FA0043

September 30, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/47

(Case F-43/09)(1)

(Civil Service - Staff Regulations of Europol - Article 29 - Advancement in step granted on the basis of staff reports - Plea of illegality of the decision establishing the policy for determining grades and steps - Respective powers of Europol’s Director and Management Board - Europol’s Director’s discretion - Limits)

2010/C 317/82

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicant: Carlo van Heuckelom (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: W.J. Dammingh and N.D.Dane, lawyers)

Defendant: European Police Office (Europol) (represented by: D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents, assisted initially by B. Wägenbaur and R. Van der Hout, lawyers, then by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Annulment of the decision of 14 July 2008 awarding the applicant a single step of classification in grade and of the decision of 19 January 2009 rejecting the complaint brought against the first decision

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses Mr. van Heuckelom’s action;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

(1)

OJ C 180, 01/08/2009, p. 63.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia