I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Purely confirmatory act - New substantive facts - Burden of proof))
(2017/C 006/45)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Ingrid Fedtke (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented by: M. Pascua Mateo, K. Gambino, X. Chamodraka, A. Carvajal and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and B. Wagenbäur, lawyer)
Appeal lodged against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2016, Fedtke v EESC (F-107/15, EU:2016:F:15), seeking to have that order set aside.
The Court:
1.Sets aside the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2016, Fedtke v EESC (F-107/15);
2.Refers the action to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled in the present appeal;
3.Reserves the costs.
(1)
OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.