- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-234/20: Order of the General Court of 8 December 2022 — HB v EIB (Civil service — Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TB0234
62020TB0234
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.2.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 71/27
(Case T-234/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - Applicant who has ceased to reply to the Court’s requests - No need to adjudicate)
(2023/C 71/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: HB (represented by: A. Guillerme, T. Bontinck and L. Burguin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant, HB, seeks annulment, first, of her 2017 performance appraisal and, second, of the decision of the Adjudication Panel of 21 October 2019, rejecting her appeal against her 2017 performance appraisal.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.