- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-160/17: Action brought on 10 March 2017 — RY v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0160
62017TN0160
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.5.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 144/55
(Case T-160/17)
(2017/C 144/74)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: RY (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
Declare and rule:
—The decision of 27 April 2016 of the Director General of the Human Resources and Security Directorate General (DG HR) terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff concluded for an indefinite period under Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS is annulled;
—The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of the right of the applicant to be heard before the adoption of the decision terminating the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period. According to the applicant, the contested decision was adopted in breach of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. In addition, it was adopted in breach of the obligation to state reasons and, more exactly, of the right of the applicant to be informed of all the objective complaints which underlie the contested decision and, in particular, the reasons for an alleged breakdown in the relationship of trust.